Fix typos found by codespell

This commit is contained in:
SunBlack 2023-11-17 19:40:50 +01:00
parent f46bffcd69
commit 36e64633b4
2 changed files with 15 additions and 15 deletions

View File

@ -2858,12 +2858,12 @@ namespace exprtk
((s_itr_ + 4) <= s_end_)
)
{
const bool x_seperator = ('X' == std::toupper(*(s_itr_ + 1)));
const bool x_separator = ('X' == std::toupper(*(s_itr_ + 1)));
const bool both_digits = details::is_hex_digit(*(s_itr_ + 2)) &&
details::is_hex_digit(*(s_itr_ + 3)) ;
if (!(x_seperator && both_digits))
if (!(x_separator && both_digits))
{
t.set_error(token::e_err_string, initial_itr, s_itr_, base_itr_);
token_list_.push_back(t);
@ -12134,7 +12134,7 @@ namespace exprtk
{
public:
// Function of N paramters.
// Function of N parameters.
typedef expression_node<T>* expression_ptr;
typedef std::pair<expression_ptr,bool> branch_t;
typedef IFunction ifunction;
@ -21925,7 +21925,7 @@ namespace exprtk
if (index < error_list_.size())
return error_list_[index];
else
throw std::invalid_argument("parser::get_error() - Invalid error index specificed");
throw std::invalid_argument("parser::get_error() - Invalid error index specified");
}
inline std::string error() const
@ -23611,7 +23611,7 @@ namespace exprtk
}
else
{
const token_t::token_type seperator = token_t::e_eof;
const token_t::token_type separator = token_t::e_eof;
scope_handler sh(*this);
@ -23642,12 +23642,12 @@ namespace exprtk
const bool is_next_until = peek_token_is(token_t::e_symbol) &&
peek_token_is("until");
if (!token_is(seperator) && is_next_until)
if (!token_is(separator) && is_next_until)
{
set_error(
make_error(parser_error::e_syntax,
current_token(),
"ERR064 - Expected '" + token_t::to_str(seperator) + "' in body of repeat until loop",
"ERR064 - Expected '" + token_t::to_str(separator) + "' in body of repeat until loop",
exprtk_error_location));
return error_node();
@ -24493,7 +24493,7 @@ namespace exprtk
{
token_t::token_type open_bracket = token_t::e_lcrlbracket;
token_t::token_type close_bracket = token_t::e_rcrlbracket;
token_t::token_type seperator = token_t::e_eof;
token_t::token_type separator = token_t::e_eof;
if (!token_is(open_bracket))
{
@ -24501,7 +24501,7 @@ namespace exprtk
{
open_bracket = token_t::e_lbracket;
close_bracket = token_t::e_rbracket;
seperator = token_t::e_comma;
separator = token_t::e_comma;
}
else
{
@ -24550,12 +24550,12 @@ namespace exprtk
const bool is_next_close = peek_token_is(close_bracket);
if (!token_is(seperator) && is_next_close)
if (!token_is(separator) && is_next_close)
{
set_error(
make_error(parser_error::e_syntax,
current_token(),
"ERR103 - Expected '" + details::to_str(seperator) + "' for call to multi-sequence section of " + source,
"ERR103 - Expected '" + details::to_str(separator) + "' for call to multi-sequence section of " + source,
exprtk_error_location));
return error_node();

View File

@ -3044,7 +3044,7 @@ inline bool run_test03()
if (parser.compile(invalid_expr[i],expression))
{
printf("run_test03() - Error: [1] Invalid expression compiled successfuly. Expression: %s\n",
printf("run_test03() - Error: [1] Invalid expression compiled successfully. Expression: %s\n",
invalid_expr[i].c_str());
return false;
@ -3070,7 +3070,7 @@ inline bool run_test03()
if (parser.compile(invalid_expr[i],expression))
{
printf("run_test03() - Error: [2] Invalid expression compiled successfuly. Expression: %s\n",
printf("run_test03() - Error: [2] Invalid expression compiled successfully. Expression: %s\n",
invalid_expr[i].c_str());
return false;
@ -4466,7 +4466,7 @@ inline bool run_test10()
expected_var_symbol_list.begin());
if (!var_result)
{
printf("run_test10() - Failed collected variable comparison between recieved and expected variables\n");
printf("run_test10() - Failed collected variable comparison between received and expected variables\n");
return false;
}
@ -4476,7 +4476,7 @@ inline bool run_test10()
expected_func_symbol_list.begin());
if (!func_result)
{
printf("run_test10() - Failed collected fuctions comparison between recieved and expected functions\n");
printf("run_test10() - Failed collected functions comparison between received and expected functions\n");
return false;
}
}